Thursday, January 29, 2009

Different Kinds Of Labias

BIZARRE WORLD




If the immunity law and restrictions on wiretapping laws will seem absurd and bizarre you wrong ....
oligarchic governments of the world's nations have, throughout history, enacted laws weird and often without any logic!
As they say in these cases ... Different countries different customs, and try to tell you exactly why these strange laws so that you can travel without any problem with the foreign law .....
In Arizona it is forbidden to laugh in public if you miss more than one tooth in the mouth (beware old men) in Alabama, unless otherwise fake mustache in church (a carnival put anything) in Ohai is not permitted to give water fish (...); But in England it is forbidden to go around topless but it can make orders for tropical fish stores (perhaps because he makes more ...); to all the nostalgic atmosphere of the Middle Ages, Scotland, in York County, you can hit a Scot with an arrow .... except Sundays, in Canada you can not go on a tram if you have recently eaten dishes of garlic ... I leave you with this latest gem to your holiday possible in these fabulous places .......

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Replace A Scratched Lcd

challenge you to prove otherwise



First of all I apologize for my extended absence from this blog but it was not up to me ... I have saved lives and professed peace in this period away from the web but this is not important ... what more I would like to show you is a simple demonstration.
Some time ago a young man named Richard maceratese Mengoni replied to my simple statement ... it was as follows: "... I challenge anyone to prove otherwise ..."... A sentence outside of a context is devoid of any meaning ... but Richard, being a guy full of fantasy that manages to open his mind, he replied giving me an explanation if anything interesting enough for this blog ... the answer is seguiente:

"My demonstration will be conducted x absurd and will be exemplified in 2 parts:
1) if it is possible to demonstrate the 'opposite' then the opposite of 'opposite', being ank'esso 'hand', is certified pur'esso However, since this is the 2nd 'opposed' nothing else than the reverse of 1 'opposed' it follows that the demonstration of 2nd hand is different from the demonstration of 1 hand ... but both being 'against' then we face two well- demonstrations of the 'opposite'. Conclusion: No there is only a demonstration of the 'hand' but well 2) and then summing up ... we are faced with two demonstrations: the first is the demonstration of 1 'Contrary', the second demonstration is 2 ° 'opposite' .. but as the 2nd 'opposed' the opposite of 1 'opposed' it follows that their respective proofs are not ... So we have 2 x otherwise the demonstrations 'opposed' .. but it is impossible to attribute a 2 x otherwise demonstrations concept (in our case the 'opposite'). So we come to the absurd. Conclusion: No you can prove otherwise "

Richard Mengoni

Well what to say .... .... !.... THE CONTRARY Prove