First of all I apologize for my extended absence from this blog but it was not up to me ... I have saved lives and professed peace in this period away from the web but this is not important ... what more I would like to show you is a simple demonstration.
Some time ago a young man named Richard maceratese Mengoni replied to my simple statement ... it was as follows: "... I challenge anyone to prove otherwise ..."... A sentence outside of a context is devoid of any meaning ... but Richard, being a guy full of fantasy that manages to open his mind, he replied giving me an explanation if anything interesting enough for this blog ... the answer is seguiente:
"My demonstration will be conducted x absurd and will be exemplified in 2 parts:
1) if it is possible to demonstrate the 'opposite' then the opposite of 'opposite', being ank'esso 'hand', is certified pur'esso However, since this is the 2nd 'opposed' nothing else than the reverse of 1 'opposed' it follows that the demonstration of 2nd hand is different from the demonstration of 1 hand ... but both being 'against' then we face two well- demonstrations of the 'opposite'. Conclusion: No there is only a demonstration of the 'hand' but well 2) and then summing up ... we are faced with two demonstrations: the first is the demonstration of 1 'Contrary', the second demonstration is 2 ° 'opposite' .. but as the 2nd 'opposed' the opposite of 1 'opposed' it follows that their respective proofs are not ... So we have 2 x otherwise the demonstrations 'opposed' .. but it is impossible to attribute a 2 x otherwise demonstrations concept (in our case the 'opposite'). So we come to the absurd. Conclusion: No you can prove otherwise "
Richard Mengoni
Well what to say .... .... !.... THE CONTRARY Prove
0 comments:
Post a Comment